OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, has entered into an agreement with the UK government to explore the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing the efficiency of public services, according to a government announcement. Reports Technology News
The non-binding agreement, signed with the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, outlines a shared ambition to apply AI tools across sectors such as education, defence, security, and the justice system. It could also pave the way for OpenAI to access government data to support these initiatives.
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle described AI as “fundamental in driving change” and a key driver of future economic growth in the UK.
However, not everyone is convinced. Digital privacy advocates voiced concern over what they see as the government’s overly trusting stance toward major tech firms. Critics argue the deal reflects a broader trend of embracing tech promises without clear safeguards.
The agreement mentions the potential creation of an “information sharing programme” and the joint development of protective measures to ensure public safety and uphold democratic principles. It also suggests the UK and OpenAI may collaborate on expanding AI infrastructure—likely through new or upgraded data centres—and highlights OpenAI’s intention to grow its London presence, where the firm already employs over 100 staff.
Though the agreement is not legally binding, it sets out a framework for cooperation. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman expressed optimism, saying the initiative aims to “deliver prosperity for all.”
Experts see potential benefits in freeing up public sector professionals to focus on complex tasks that AI may not be suited to. Dr. Gordon Fletcher of the University of Salford noted that such tools could allow highly skilled civil servants to concentrate on “the difficult one-in-a-million situations that AI might struggle to address.” Still, he questioned whether this could be achieved in a transparent and ethical way, especially with limited reliance on public data.
Digital rights group Foxglove criticised the agreement as “hopelessly vague.” Co-executive Director Martha Dark warned that the government’s vast store of public data could be a valuable asset for OpenAI as it trains future versions of ChatGPT.
